Non-ComplianceQAProcedure Writing

10 Most Common NDT Procedure Non-Compliances (and How to Fix Them)

The most frequently found non-compliances across UT, RT, MT, PT, and PAUT procedures — based on AI review of hundreds of NDT procedures — with exact corrective wording for each.

NDTVerify Editorial··9 min read
10
Common Issues
Across all NDT methods
100%
All Fixable
With exact corrective wording
All
Methods
UT, RT, MT, PT, PAUT
With Fixes
Exact clause references
Data Source: These findings are drawn from AI review of NDT procedures across UT, RT, MT, PT, PAUT, TOFD, ET, and LT methods, submitted by NDT companies and inspection firms globally.

#1 — Vague or Missing Acceptance Criteria

All methods

The problem: The most common — and most serious — non-compliance. A procedure that states "rejectable indications shall not be permitted" without referencing a specific code clause and paragraph is not compliant.

✓ Fix: Add: "Acceptance criteria shall be in accordance with [Code], [Article/Section], Paragraph [T-xxx / Clause X.X]. Indications exceeding [specific threshold] shall be considered rejectable." Always include the edition year of the referenced code.

#2 — Personnel Qualification Not Stated

All methods

The problem: Procedures often reference examination requirements but fail to state the minimum certification level required for personnel performing the examination. This is a T-150 (ASME) and SNT-TC-1A requirement.

✓ Fix: Add a dedicated section: "Qualification Requirements — Personnel performing examinations under this procedure shall hold a minimum NDT Level II certification in [Method] in accordance with [Company] Written Practice [Doc. No.], conforming to ASNT SNT-TC-1A [Edition]."

#3 — Missing Maximum Dwell Times (PT)

PT

The problem: For Liquid Penetrant, ASME Section V T-672 requires both minimum and maximum dwell times. Procedures stating only "minimum 10 minutes penetrant dwell" without a maximum are non-compliant.

✓ Fix: State both: "Penetrant dwell time: minimum 10 minutes, maximum 60 minutes. Developer dwell time: minimum 10 minutes, maximum 4 hours for non-aqueous developer." Adjust values to your penetrant manufacturer's recommendation for the specific material.

#4 — Scan Overlap Not Specified (UT)

UT / PAUT

The problem: ASME T-522 and most client specifications require a minimum 10% index overlap between adjacent scan passes. Many UT procedures specify scan direction and coverage but omit the numerical overlap requirement.

✓ Fix: Add: "Adjacent scans shall overlap a minimum of 10% of the search unit dimension in the scan direction to ensure 100% examination coverage of the required volume."

#5 — No Calibration Frequency Stated

UT, RT, MT, PT, ET

The problem: Procedures specify calibration references but fail to state how often calibration must be verified during examination. ASME and most codes require calibration checks at the start, during, and at the end of the examination.

✓ Fix: Add: "Instrument calibration shall be verified: (a) at the start of each examination period; (b) at the conclusion of each examination period; (c) every [X hours] during continuous examination; (d) whenever the examiner, instrument, search unit, or couplant is changed; (e) whenever examination results are questionable."

#6 — Reference Standard Not Described

UT, PAUT

The problem: Procedures state "calibrate using ASME basic calibration block" but do not describe the block dimensions, material, reflector sizes, or drawing reference. The calibration block must be fully described or referenced by a controlled drawing.

✓ Fix: Either include a dimensional drawing of the reference standard as an appendix, or reference a controlled document: "Reference Standard: ASME V1 basic calibration block per SE-797, Drawing No. [XXX], Material: [P-number], Nominal Thickness: [X]mm."

#7 — IQI Selection Not Justified (RT)

RT

The problem: Radiographic procedures often specify an IQI type and placement but do not show the selection basis — IQI material should match the base material, and the required sensitivity (essential wire or hole) must be stated.

✓ Fix: Add: "IQI shall be selected per ASME Section V, Article 2, Table T-233.1. For [material type], [wire/hole-type] IQI, [material designation] shall be used. Required sensitivity: [essential wire diameter] visible on radiograph."

#8 — UV Light Intensity Not Specified (MT/PT fluorescent)

MT (fluorescent), PT (Type I)

The problem: Fluorescent MT and PT procedures require minimum UV-A intensity (black light). Most procedures omit the minimum required intensity at the examination surface (1,000 μW/cm² per ASME) and the maximum allowable ambient white light (2 foot-candles).

✓ Fix: Add: "UV-A intensity at the examination surface shall be a minimum of 1,000 μW/cm². Ambient white light shall not exceed 2 foot-candles (21.5 lux). UV lamp shall be allowed to warm up for a minimum of 5 minutes before use."

#9 — Written Practice Not Referenced or Doesn't Exist

All methods

The problem: Companies operating under SNT-TC-1A are required to have a Written Practice. Procedures reference "the company written practice" by name but no document number or revision is cited — and in many cases, no such document exists.

✓ Fix: Establish a formal Written Practice per SNT-TC-1A Annex A format. Reference it in every procedure by controlled document number: "Personnel shall be qualified and certified per [Company Name] Written Practice, Document No. WP-NDT-001, Revision [X]."

#10 — Reporting Requirements Incomplete

All methods

The problem: ASME T-180 requires examination records to include specific minimum content. Many procedures omit the required documentation list or reference only "an examination report shall be completed" without specifying content.

✓ Fix: Add a Reporting section listing minimum required content: "(a) Procedure number and revision; (b) Equipment identification (make, model, serial number); (c) Personnel name(s) and certification level(s); (d) Date of examination; (e) Location and extent of examination; (f) Examination results; (g) Acceptance/rejection criteria used; (h) Disposition of indications found."

How to Systematically Eliminate Non-Compliances

The most effective approach is a pre-submission review before your Level 3 engineer sees the procedure. By the time a procedure reaches Level 3 review, any major gaps will result in a revision cycle — which costs time and money.

A structured review against each applicable standard (SNT-TC-1A, ASME Section V, ISO 9712, plus any client specifications) before submission catches the majority of non-compliances listed above. NDTVerify automates this review using AI — upload your PDF and receive a structured report showing every element as PASS, WARNING, FAIL, or MISSING with exact corrective actions.

Catch Non-Compliances Before Your Level 3 Does

AI review against ASNT, ASME, API, and ISO — full 7-section compliance report in under 30 minutes. From $20.

Start Your Review

Ready to Review Your NDT Procedure?

AI reviews your PDF against ASNT, ASME, API, and ISO standards. Full compliance report in under 30 minutes.

Start Your Review — $20